Go to Democraticunderground.com

and look at this post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x5184

and read the comments. You do not need to watch the video to get the story straight.


The short version (lazy bastards!):

Hangs out at Free Republic
Lives in basement
Loves sci-fi
Unemployed
GOP member
Mails white powder/anthrax to liberals
Now claims he has a psychological problem

That's funny. You tell a Republican that he's fucking crazy and he takes it as a compliment, like you're saying he's too "real" for you, and that Democrats can't handle "reality." But then when "reality" takes the form of an arrest warrant (or a Congressional page sex scandal, or influence-peddling investigation, or Jack Abramoff), he pisses himself and declares that, yep, he really was crazy that whole time, by God! He was a drunk, or an abuse victim, or just plain nuts.

Being a Republican is a mental disease, whose only cure appears to be indictment.

Judy Miller wants back in

She now wants everybody to know that Bush and his policies stink, and that she's totally out front of that story, you know, as a reporter and all.

Sorry, lady: you're over as a credible source for anything, and this is the depths of pandering. If the GOP had held one or both houses of Congress, you would still be (wrongly) decrying your jail term for covering up the White House snitch. Oh, and she says blogs can be part of the media as long as they live up to "the standards." First, who went to jail and left you boss, bitch? Second, what "standards" do you mean? Leaking classified information and then obstructing an investigation? With the Democrats back on oversight, you'll be lucky not to get hauled in again to explain yourself.

Maybe you can be the press agent for McCain in '08? Until then, try to fall in a hole.

You Want an Apocalypse?

Neo-Cons and religious nuts want chaos in the Middle East in order to hasten the return on capital or else the return of Christ--and maybe they're the same thing nowadays. Israel now is saying it could pull a pre-emptive strike on Iran, likely triggering a region-wide nuclear conflict that would be, like, totally RAD.

There's only one way to receive news like that: Let's get it on. Two can play at this game: speaking for liberals everywhere, I say bring on the Apocalypse if it removes forever the stain of the political state of Israel from the landscape.

Pat Robertson wants war in the Middle East because when Solomon's temple is rebuilt on the Temple Mount, Jesus will return. Neo-Cons want war in the Middle East because it will bring about the ascendancy of the American global corporate state, and usher in another American Century (which is really just corporate interests writ large, but why not call it "American"?).

As liberals, we should also seek total annihilation of the Middle East, because once that's done, we can get on with governing the civilized world and making the nation responsive to the needs of Americans, not the Zionists. One strain of Marxism held that the worse things became, the better it was, because it brought the world closer to the communist revolution. If the evangelicals and PNAC wankers can have their versions of the Rapture, then here's another one.

Communism may not be the end result of war in the Middle East, but the severance of our irrational ties to Israel could be. The effect of that is the reinstatement of logical policy and it brings the United States one step closer to permanent rejection of neoconservatism and religious fundamentalism (which, of course, is anything but fundamentally sound).

My God is the God of vengeance, and he's looking to gut a Republican or two.

Imaginary People

NYT confirms: 4 million evangelicals never existed. (Sorry, but I refuse to register with the Times to read the full article, so I'm guessing at the rest of it, based on what I want it to say)

Religious voters did not abandon the GOP and also they did not stay away from the polls. Based on exit polls (which, by the way, targeted conservatives this time by a 39%-36% margin over liberals, to avoid the "only liberals talk to exit pollsters" crap), religious voters all pretty much voted GOP. And the same number of Americans voted in this election as in the last one. There's a problem here...

...oh, I get it! MORE actual, real people voted against Republicans in this election, and less fake, made-up religious voters voted for Republicans--hence why the exit polls say Godsters stuck with the GOP, and yet the GOP received far, far fewer votes. Add 4 million anti-GOP votes and subtract 4 million imaginary GOP votes, and you get solid-if-indirect evidence of just how the 2004 election was stolen.

Somebody read the rest of the article and let me know where the NYT says that. 4 million imaginary dollars says it isn't in there.

That's Our Boy, George

"The message yesterday was clear. The American people want their leaders in Washington to set aside partisan differences, conduct ourselves in an ethical manner, and work together to address the challenges facing our nation," Bush said.

It would seem that America wants partisanship, "Mr. President," as evidenced by the total rejection of your party in a partisan election. Elections are not bipartisan. Try again, you fuck.

"When the unnamed man finished slapping his nutsack on the President's face, Mr. Bush turned to the astonished press corps and explained that, in his opinion, the man had just been thanking him for doing such a great job over the last 6 years by flossing the President's teeth with his short-and-curlies. Mr. Bush then explained that his upcoming war crimes trial was actually the public's salute to his bipartisanship. 'Hey, I went to Iraq because that's what America wanted. And by turning me over to the tribunal, the American people are saying, 'Here, he's our best man. Try him and let him exonerate us!'"

Could somebody please rid us of this dangerous imebecile now?